Template 1a with METHOD = 2 t y true y 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.785 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 1.571 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.356 0.7071 0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 3.142 0.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 -1.0000 3.927 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 4.712 -1.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.498 -0.7071 -0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 6.283 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 YMAX(L) 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 The cost of the integration in evaluations of F is 109 ******************************************************************************* Template 1a with METHOD = 1 t y true y 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.785 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 1.571 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.356 0.7071 0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 3.142 0.0000 0.0000 -0.9999 -1.0000 3.927 -0.7070 -0.7071 -0.7070 -0.7071 4.712 -0.9999 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.498 -0.7070 -0.7071 0.7070 0.7071 6.283 0.0000 0.0000 0.9998 1.0000 YMAX(L) 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 The cost of the integration in evaluations of F is 292 ******************************************************************************* Template 1a with METHOD = 3 t y true y 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.785 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 1.571 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.356 0.7071 0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 3.142 0.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 -1.0000 3.927 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 4.712 -1.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.498 -0.7071 -0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 6.283 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 YMAX(L) 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 The cost of the integration in evaluations of F is 105 ******************************************************************************* Template 1b with METHOD = 2 t y true y 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.785 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 1.571 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.356 0.7071 0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 3.142 0.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 -1.0000 3.927 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 4.712 -1.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.498 -0.7071 -0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 6.283 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 YMAX(L) 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 The tolerance was 5.00E-05 The worst global error observed was 4.13E-05. (It occurred at 6.16E+00.) The RMS errors in the individual components were: 1.84E-05 1.67E-05 The cost of the integration in evaluations of F was 249 ******************************************************************************* Template 1b with METHOD = 1 t y true y 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.785 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 1.571 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.356 0.7071 0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 3.142 0.0000 0.0000 -0.9999 -1.0000 3.927 -0.7070 -0.7071 -0.7070 -0.7071 4.712 -0.9999 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.498 -0.7070 -0.7071 0.7070 0.7071 6.283 0.0000 0.0000 0.9998 1.0000 YMAX(L) 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 The tolerance was 5.00E-05 The worst global error observed was 8.81E-04. (It occurred at 6.30E+00.) The RMS errors in the individual components were: 1.53E-04 1.22E-04 The cost of the integration in evaluations of F was 1120 ******************************************************************************* Template 1b with METHOD = 3 t y true y 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.785 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 1.571 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.356 0.7071 0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 3.142 0.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 -1.0000 3.927 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 -0.7071 4.712 -1.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.498 -0.7071 -0.7071 0.7071 0.7071 6.283 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 YMAX(L) 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 The tolerance was 5.00E-05 The worst global error observed was 5.13E-08. (It occurred at 6.28E+00.) The RMS errors in the individual components were: 2.27E-08 1.71E-08 The cost of the integration in evaluations of F was 313